CHRIS CHADWELL - freelance botanist, lecturer, educator, photographer, leader of 24 expeditions along the Himalaya, anachronism & GENUINE conservationist; his hard-won expertise (where he has risked health, life & limb) on the flora of the NW Himalaya & borderlands of Western Tibet, built up over 40 years, is unrivalled, yet, sadly, largely going to waste - he is in the unenviable position of feeling he must tell the truth, whilst the world's major botanical institutions sit by.

There is no reward in this world for being either a good Samaritan or man of honour.

Plants cannot be conserved in the wild (or cultivation for that matter), if they are not correctly identified in the first place, with abundance or rarity, reliably recorded (which is not happening: rubbish is being put into data-bases/computers, so rubbish comes out; it is impossible to discover whether a species is rare or abundant, sat in an office/herbarium or by copying century-old records, which is a widespread practise in the Indian sub-continent, resulting in unreliable floras! Fake claims of rarity or being 'critically' Endangered are submitted, when they are no such thing!). Very few botanists or so-called 'naturalists' in the Indian sub-continent know how to reliably and accurately identify plants. One can only assess genuine rarity if extensive surveys are undertaken by competent field botanists, operating in the wilds - typical 'surveys' by university & Botanical Survey of India botanists consist of surveying road/track-side plants on flat ground just metres from a jeep, with the poor quality, scrappy specimens actually collected by an un-trained assistants, with virtually no field notes. They cannot possibly tell what is genuinely rare if the do not trek extensively and scramble up and over steep terrain (which they do not) - the Himalaya is a vast expanse; surveying methodically & reliably at higher altitude, is demanding.

Regrettably, I must observe that both efloraofIndia and iNaturalist contain a significant proportion of misidentifications, certainly as far as 'Himalayan' plants are concerned - the 'algorithm' in the latter is strongly 'North American'-biased, with numerous 'naturalists' from around the world, blindly using it, resulting in laughable suggestions, then any two observations resulting in supposedly 'research' grade identifications - they are no such thing. As for efloraofIndia - so-called experts. who are not, attack and belittle Chris for telling the truth and thus 'showing them up'....

e-mail: chrischadwell261@btinternet.com Look into Chris' eyes - is he a liar or telling the truth?